From bauschke@cecm.sfu.ca Tue Mar 12 21:19:00 1996
Received: from banzai.cecm.sfu.ca by pineapple.apmaths.uwo.ca (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA26890; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 21:18:59 -0500
Received: by cecm.sfu.ca (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
	 id SAA08457; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 18:26:14 -0800
From: bauschke@cecm.sfu.ca (Heinz Bauschke)
Message-Id: <199603130226.SAA08457@cecm.sfu.ca>
Subject: Your submission. ISSAC #063 (fwd)
To: rcorless@cecm.sfu.ca (Rob Corless)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 18:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Cc: bauschke@cecm.sfu.ca (Heinz Bauschke)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 822       
Status: R

> ----
> We want to think now about using the referee's reports, which will
> follow, to improve the paper and to submit it elsewhere.  Jon's
> Mapletech issue is a natural, but I think you had another journal
> in mind, that we discussed?  It has slipped my mind now.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Rob
> 


Dear Rob:

Thanks for the news. I think we should proceed as follows: Let us wait
and see what the referee report say. If they trash the manuscript,
then I would not want to submit the manuscript anywhere else. If they
don't trash it, then I would suggest OMP or Maple Tech.

I don't recall another option, maybe I was dreaming ;)

Cheers,

  Heinz

PS: I just sent a similar sounding email to isaac cause I blindly
replied to the message you forwarded me. Tough luck.
But I didn't say anything nasty about the organizers :-)